Blog
Why Do Hydraulic Closure Structures and Impact Loads Present Unique Challenges?

For centuries, various types of hydraulic closure structures have been used to control and manage water in riverine and coastal settings. Popular types in use today include roller and trolley gates, single- and double-leaf swing gates, stoplogs, and passive gate closures. In contrast to floodwalls, dams, spillways, and other fixed hydraulic structures, closure structures are designed to move into place during extreme weather to prevent downstream flooding—and as such, they are more vulnerable than fixed structures to impacts from utility poles, vessels, trees, and ice.

The task of analyzing and designing hydraulic closure structures to withstand such impact loads is a niche part of hydraulic structures engineering. Yet, as precipitation and flooding intensify and new closure types come into common usage, states, municipal governments, utilities, and other entities that operate flood management infrastructure would benefit from having a better understanding of the recommendations and design guidance set by agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Having spent 15 years as a structural engineer for USACE, I can attest to the importance of an analysis that considers conditions far from the closure site and that takes a site-specific, risk-informed approach.

Wooded Debris and Vessels Cause Most Impact Loads

Compared to common hydraulic loads—hydrostatic, hydrodynamic, and seismic—impact loading on hydraulic closure structures is highly variable and difficult to predict. USACE, FEMA, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and state and local jurisdictions provide guidance and codes. However, site conditions often require specialized expertise and careful engineering judgment to evaluate the probability of occurrence and the magnitude of impact forces.

Most impact loads on closure structures come from wooded debris, ice, and vessels, as was the case with Superstorm Sandy. In designing for wooded debris and vessel impact loads, engineers must assess not just conditions where the hydraulic closure structures will be deployed, but conditions and uses around the site. For example, docked and moored vessels could impact a closure structure hundreds of yards from shore. Utility poles even farther away could be dislodged in a flood and sent with significant velocity into a closure structure. Field surveys to identify such potential hazards can help make sure the risks of damage to a structure from impact loads are considered in the structure design.


Passive Gate Closures: Use Risk-Based Approach to Determine Applicability

Passive gate closures are a relatively new type of hydraulic closure structure that can be deployed quickly while potentially providing cost savings to the owner. Additionally, they have the advertised advantage of deploying automatically because of uplift from water acting on the structure.

For the benefit of engineers and other flood management professionals considering passive gate closure structures as they build or modify flood infrastructure, I conducted an internal case study at our firm to evaluate how well this type of gate would perform if struck by various impact loads—from small utility poles to large barges and other vessels.

In designing for wooded debris and vessel impact loads, engineers must assess not just conditions where the hydraulic closure structures will be deployed, but conditions and uses around the site."Patrick Luff

The passive gate closure structure I studied was five feet wide by 7.5 feet tall. When engaged, it’s held in place by two pinned retention arms. While the gate appears robust, with a half-inch aluminum skin plate stiffened by seven horizontal girders and six vertical channels, it has some vulnerabilities that an engineer without significant hydraulic steel structure design experience might miss, including:

  • One arises from the reduction in yield strength of the aluminum material resulting from welding the girders and channels to the plate. The heat generated from welding affects the microstructure of the aluminum material, particularly in the heat-affected zone, leading to a decrease in strength.  As a result, I reduced the original allowable yield strength.
  • The tension arms that keep the plate upright are vulnerable to impact loading from vessels, utility poles, and other items since they are located on the flood side of the structure.
  • The welding methods and the use of aluminum and stainless steel bring the potential for corrosion and weld failures.
  • Because impact loading usually occurs during an extreme weather event, hydrostatic and other types of loading would also be high. Therefore, I conducted independent analyses to assess how well the skin plate, girders, and retention arms would likely perform under a range of combined load cases recommended by USACE. All three components were found to have a level of uncertainty in their ability to structurally perform for a portion of these load combinations.

Some readers might think that I’m advocating for over-engineering hydraulic closure structures to withstand the most unlikely worst-case scenarios. On the contrary, I advocate a risk-informed design approach that includes a sober look at potential impact sources and potential design flaws in closure structures. Without such an approach, communities may be exposed to risks of extensive property damage and even lost lives—all while experiencing a false sense of security from an inadequately designed closure structure.

In an era when public infrastructure managers are rightly focused on building for a resilient future, correct analysis and design of hydraulic closure structures should be a core element of every project where such structures are implemented. Whether a flood resilience project is in a coastal, riverine, or combination of both environments, we recommend communities develop impact loading zones and load combination criteria for engineers to utilize on these projects. This mapping of impact loading zones will also help to bring consistency in use of uniform standards within the community.